<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
			xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Identity Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleblanc.blogs.plymouth.edu/2008/07/20/identity-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleblanc.blogs.plymouth.edu/2008/07/20/identity-management/</link>
	<description>Technology, Society and Me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:41:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://cleblanc.blogs.plymouth.edu/2008/07/20/identity-management/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 04:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleblanc.blogs.plymouth.edu/?p=36#comment-275</guid>
		<description>When I first signed up for Facebook, I was able to gloss over the &quot;Friend&quot; semantic hurdle because NO ONE I was &quot;friending&quot; was my &quot;friend.&quot; (Which do I love more, quotation marks, or parentheses?)  Anyhow, this was back when you still needed an .edu email address to even get ON facebook, and all my so-called friends were my students.  But the uniformity of their non-friendness (!!!!) somehow made it easier, right?  Since the .edu requirement was dropped, and since other colleagues and ACTUAL FRIENDS of mine have joined up, there&#039;s suddenly this semantic muddiness.  Robin S. is my friend. My students are my students.  I thought the &quot;Circle of Friends&quot; thing might be a way to draw some of these lines, but, um, I&#039;m kind of starting to get annoyed with it.  And of course, I will tend to reveal more, let the hair down more, etc., with real friends.  But not on facebook.  Because not all my Friends are friends.  Huh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first signed up for Facebook, I was able to gloss over the &#8220;Friend&#8221; semantic hurdle because NO ONE I was &#8220;friending&#8221; was my &#8220;friend.&#8221; (Which do I love more, quotation marks, or parentheses?)  Anyhow, this was back when you still needed an .edu email address to even get ON facebook, and all my so-called friends were my students.  But the uniformity of their non-friendness (!!!!) somehow made it easier, right?  Since the .edu requirement was dropped, and since other colleagues and ACTUAL FRIENDS of mine have joined up, there&#8217;s suddenly this semantic muddiness.  Robin S. is my friend. My students are my students.  I thought the &#8220;Circle of Friends&#8221; thing might be a way to draw some of these lines, but, um, I&#8217;m kind of starting to get annoyed with it.  And of course, I will tend to reveal more, let the hair down more, etc., with real friends.  But not on facebook.  Because not all my Friends are friends.  Huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cleblanc</title>
		<link>http://cleblanc.blogs.plymouth.edu/2008/07/20/identity-management/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>cleblanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleblanc.blogs.plymouth.edu/?p=36#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I completely agree that you have to keep up the effort to &quot;fence your persona&quot; online.  I just wish it was easier to do that.  And part of the problem with today&#039;s environments is that it&#039;s difficult to see what you&#039;re presenting to people.  In FaceBook, for example, I can&#039;t look at my page as it will be viewed by my networks.  I would like to be able to see that.

I also think you could have control plus one input device if the input device allowed you to assign a variety of “roles” to your “friends”. You could then put items out there and only let people in a particular role see those items. So in a dinner party with your work friends, you might remove certain items from the medicine cabinet but if it’s a dinner party with your “real” friends (here’s the difficulty with everyone being a “friend”), you’ll probably make different choices. I think the blog is a little different because no one has to be logged into an &quot;environment&quot; (other than a web browser) in order to see it. It’s much more public than environments like FaceBook or Flickr.  But I think even with a blog, you could have an option about what is public and what is visible to which type of reader.

I think that as people use these social environments more, we are going to want to be able to control what&#039;s presented in ways that more closely match the &quot;real world&quot;.  I can envision a tool that has different channels--one for FaceBook, one for Flickr, one for Twitter, and so on--and that allows you to have a kind &quot;meta-control&quot; over how your persona is presented in these environments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree that you have to keep up the effort to &#8220;fence your persona&#8221; online.  I just wish it was easier to do that.  And part of the problem with today&#8217;s environments is that it&#8217;s difficult to see what you&#8217;re presenting to people.  In FaceBook, for example, I can&#8217;t look at my page as it will be viewed by my networks.  I would like to be able to see that.</p>
<p>I also think you could have control plus one input device if the input device allowed you to assign a variety of “roles” to your “friends”. You could then put items out there and only let people in a particular role see those items. So in a dinner party with your work friends, you might remove certain items from the medicine cabinet but if it’s a dinner party with your “real” friends (here’s the difficulty with everyone being a “friend”), you’ll probably make different choices. I think the blog is a little different because no one has to be logged into an &#8220;environment&#8221; (other than a web browser) in order to see it. It’s much more public than environments like FaceBook or Flickr.  But I think even with a blog, you could have an option about what is public and what is visible to which type of reader.</p>
<p>I think that as people use these social environments more, we are going to want to be able to control what&#8217;s presented in ways that more closely match the &#8220;real world&#8221;.  I can envision a tool that has different channels&#8211;one for FaceBook, one for Flickr, one for Twitter, and so on&#8211;and that allows you to have a kind &#8220;meta-control&#8221; over how your persona is presented in these environments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sit10</title>
		<link>http://cleblanc.blogs.plymouth.edu/2008/07/20/identity-management/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Sit10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleblanc.blogs.plymouth.edu/?p=36#comment-205</guid>
		<description>fascinating stuff.  I want to talk about this for hours. I am interested in how you do want it both ways: control of your personae, but the convenience of having only one input device.  And that is the trade off I think.  To fence your personae, I think you have to keep up the effort, just as you do in the world.  I think of Facebook as a dinner party where some of the doors in my house are closed.  You might look into my medicine cabinet while you are alone in your bathroom, and it&#039;s my responsibility to take out what I&#039;d rather you didn&#039;t know that about me.  I gave too many people my blog address, and have only all/nothing control about who reads it.  And I know that shapes what I talk about there.  have I used up my character limit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fascinating stuff.  I want to talk about this for hours. I am interested in how you do want it both ways: control of your personae, but the convenience of having only one input device.  And that is the trade off I think.  To fence your personae, I think you have to keep up the effort, just as you do in the world.  I think of Facebook as a dinner party where some of the doors in my house are closed.  You might look into my medicine cabinet while you are alone in your bathroom, and it&#8217;s my responsibility to take out what I&#8217;d rather you didn&#8217;t know that about me.  I gave too many people my blog address, and have only all/nothing control about who reads it.  And I know that shapes what I talk about there.  have I used up my character limit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
